WAR AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A PRICE THE PLANET CAN’T AFFORD




By Dr. A. Sajidas Managing Director, BIOTECH INDIA Renewable Energy International Consultant – Biogas, Organic Waste Management & Sustainable Development.

War is often framed through the lens of strategy, politics, and power—but rarely through its consequences for the Earth. While soldiers engage in combat and governments draw battle lines, the natural environment becomes an unspoken casualty. The impacts of war extend far beyond human conflict, leaving behind scars on landscapes, ecosystems, and economies that may take generations to heal. 

One of the immediate aftershocks of war is its effect on global energy systems. Armed conflict—especially in oil-rich regions—disrupts fuel production, transport, and trade. This leads to soaring fuel prices and acute shortages. Countries dependent on imported energy, particularly developing nations, take the hardest hit. Inflation spikes as transportation and manufacturing costs rise, and economic activities slow to a crawl. The 2022 war in Ukraine is a stark example: it triggered energy insecurity across Europe and exposed the world’s vulnerability to fossil fuel dependency.

Beyond economic volatility, war leaves behind a physical trail of environmental degradation. Military operations destroy forests, pollute rivers, and fill the atmosphere with smoke and chemical toxins. Explosions release carcinogenic particles and heavy metals, while damaged infrastructure—like oil depots, sewage systems, and waste plants—leaks pollutants into surrounding land and water bodies. Iconic examples include the oil well fires of the Gulf War and the toxic legacies of Agent Orange in Vietnam. These are not just temporary disruptions—they transform ecosystems, wipe out biodiversity, and imperil public health. 

The economic fabric of war-torn nations also unravels in ways that worsen environmental harm. Governments shift focus to defense and reconstruction, sidelining climate goals and environmental safeguards. Critical sectors like agriculture collapse due to land contamination or abandonment. Tourism—often reliant on natural beauty and biodiversity—disappears. And as people flee conflict zones, displaced populations put additional strain on nearby forests, rivers, and wildlife as they seek resources for shelter, food, and fuel. 

Climate change, too, doesn’t pause for war. Instead, war accelerates it. Tanks, warships, and jet fighters burn enormous quantities of fossil fuels. Bombings ignite wildfires. Deforestation is often rampant in conflict zones, and carbon-intensive industries are ramped up during rebuilding. Meanwhile, international cooperation on climate policy falters as political alliances shift and urgent action is delayed. 

Yet, in the ashes of destruction lies an opportunity: post-war recovery can embrace sustainability. Reconstruction efforts can invest in green energy, resilient infrastructure, and reforestation. This requires global cooperation and a mindset shift—to view environmental health as integral to peacebuilding, not a luxury for times of stability. As the world grapples with overlapping crises—conflict, climate change, and economic instability—it's vital to recognize their interconnection. Peace should not only mean an end to violence but a beginning for planetary healing.

1. Fuel Prices and Shortages: The First Wave of Fallout

Wars, particularly those involving major oil-producing regions, send shockwaves through global fuel markets. When conflict disrupts supply chains or destroys infrastructure, countries that depend on imported fuel suffer the consequences.


The 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict, for instance, triggered a global spike in oil and gas prices. Countries in Europe and Asia scrambled to find alternative energy sources, while millions of households faced heating crises and inflated transportation costs. The developing world bore the worst brunt, with reduced fuel availability paralyzing public transport and freight systems.

2. Environmental Pollution: Hidden Scars of Warfare

Beyond the economic shockwaves lies a more insidious threat—widespread environmental pollution. Armed conflict contaminates land, air, and water systems through:


1. Explosions and Bombardments: Release of heavy metals, particulate matter, and toxins into the air.

2. Oil Spills and Fires: Damage to oil fields and refineries often leads to vast oil spills or flaming infernos, polluting soil and air.

3. Destroyed Waste Systems: Collapsed sanitation infrastructure leaks untreated waste into rivers and groundwater.

4. Chemical Weapons: These not only devastate human life but poison ecosystems for generations. One only needs to revisit the scorched oil fields of the Gulf War or the defoliated jungles of Vietnam to understand the scale of ecological devastation that follows war.

3. The Economic Collapse Spiral

War-induced instability doesn’t just disrupt trade and industry—it erodes the very foundation of national economies. As governments divert funds toward military operations, public spending on environmental protection, renewable energy, and infrastructure declines sharply. Combined with inflation driven by shortages, countries face currency devaluation, food insecurity, and rising unemployment.

In conflict-torn regions, critical sectors such as agriculture and tourism collapse. War often displaces farmers from their fertile land, pollutes crop fields, and destroys irrigation systems. In coastal nations, oil spills and ecosystem destruction wipe out fisheries and coral reefs that once supported livelihoods.

4. Climate Fallout: War’s Accelerated Assault on Nature

Modern warfare is not only a threat to human life and geopolitical stability—it’s a powerful accelerator of environmental collapse. Armed conflict contributes to climate change through a range of destructive practices that escalate emissions, degrade landscapes, and derail environmental governance.

Combat operations rely heavily on fossil fuels. Tanks, aircraft, naval fleets, and military logistics burn vast quantities of diesel and jet fuel, releasing immense volumes of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. These emissions are often unregulated and unaccounted for in national climate targets, creating a blind spot in global efforts to slow warming.


Moreover, the physical devastation caused by war intensifies environmental decline. Forested areas are frequently targeted for strategic purposes or unintentionally destroyed during battles, leaving behind swathes of cleared land. Fires ignited by bombings or sabotage can rage uncontrollably, destroying carbon-sequestering vegetation and contributing further to atmospheric pollution. Conflict zones often witness accelerated resource extraction—wood, minerals, fossil fuels—to support war economies, exacerbating deforestation and land degradation.

Environmental damage doesn’t stop at the battlefield. War has a paralyzing effect on international and national environmental programs. Climate adaptation plans are delayed or scrapped altogether. Infrastructure for clean energy, conservation, and disaster preparedness is either destroyed or deprioritized. Funding meant for sustainable development is redirected toward military expenditures and emergency relief. In the global discourse, climate action fades into the background, undermined by urgent security agendas.

This vicious cycle results in a double blow: conflict not only contributes directly to climate instability, it also weakens our ability to respond to it.

5. Displacement and Ecological Strain: The Crisis Beyond Borders

As conflicts escalate, millions are forced to flee their homes. According to recent estimates, over 100 million people are currently displaced due to war and violence. These mass migrations, though driven by survival, carry heavy environmental consequences for host regions and the displaced populations themselves.


Refugee camps, often set up with little time for planning, grow rapidly in size and permanence. Their establishment often means clearing vegetation for temporary shelters, roads, or fuelwood. As displaced communities struggle to meet basic needs—cooking fuel, clean water, sanitation—the pressure on natural resources intensifies. Water tables drop due to over-extraction, nearby forests are stripped for firewood, and waste management becomes nearly impossible. Without sustainable infrastructure, these camps can evolve into long-term ecological stress zones.

In protracted conflicts, displacement becomes semi-permanent. Camps remain for years or even decades, sometimes evolving into informal urban settlements. Local wildlife corridors are interrupted, agricultural land is lost, and natural ecosystems experience chronic overuse. These pressures also risk sparking tension between host communities and displaced populations as resources grow increasingly scarce. 

What often goes unnoticed is the missed opportunity for environmental planning in humanitarian responses. With the right policies, displaced communities could be supported through green technologies—such as solar energy, rainwater harvesting, and ecological sanitation—that not only improve living conditions but reduce ecological strain. 

War upends more than just governments—it upends ecosystems, livelihoods, and the climate systems we all depend on.

6. Post-War Reconstruction: A Green Opportunity or Another Threat?



Rebuilding after war presents a paradox. On one hand, reconstruction provides a chance to invest in green infrastructure and renewable energy. On the other, if handled poorly, it becomes another phase of pollution and unsustainable growth.

Consider Japan’s post-WWII recovery: massive industrial expansion powered by coal and oil led to decades of pollution and environmental neglect. Yet contrast that with Rwanda, which after its civil conflict has become a model of reforestation and green urban planning.

So, what can we learn from this? Post-war recovery must integrate sustainable development goals, not just economic metrics.

A Call for Climate-Conscious Conflict Resolution

It’s time to treat environmental security as national security. War will always be a human tragedy—but its environmental echoes deepen our planetary crisis. We need a new diplomatic doctrine that includes:

•     Environmental impact assessments before military action

•     International frameworks to monitor wartime emissions

•     Green peacekeeping strategies that restore and protect ecosystems

•     Funding mechanisms to help war-torn countries rebuild sustainably

As we forge peace, we must also heal our Earth.



Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form